he was calling you a hypocrite for not seeing a contradiction. sheesh. take it off list, otherwise, but rilly, rilly you dewds have to learn to read for meaning, not speed.
i really hope y'all get laid soon.
kelley
two towns of LOB
At 05:30 PM 1/19/03 -0800, andie nachgeborenen wrote:
>If you suggest that I have ever argued or or defended torture in any
>context whatsoever, you are a lying sack of excrement, and a slanderer,
>and that statement is actionable. So yes, I am telling you what to say, or
>what not to say: shut your damn trap, don't you dare accuse me of being an
>apologist for torture under any circumstances whatdoever. I also note that
>Carrol has here disavowed the idea that it is ever acceptable to torture
>anyone for any reason. You owe him an apology. Me too, but I wouldn't
>accept it, so don't bother offering one. jks
>
> Dennis Perrin <dperrin at comcast.net> wrote:
>See what I mean? Just can it, Dennis, it's old. You wanna yell at
>torturers,w e got some in the White House and the Pentagon. jks
>
>First of all Justin, don't tell me what to say or post. Not your call,
>pal. Secondly, it's hard for me to take someone's designation of what
>torture is when that person has no problem with torture in a different
>context. If you find no contradiction here, so be it. But I'm not gonna
>tell you to can your hypocrisy. You are free to display it far and wide.
>
>DP
>
>
>
>Do you Yahoo!?
><http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com>Yahoo! Mail
>Plus - Powerful. Affordable.
><http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com>Sign up now