Great News From David Horowitz

Steven McGraw stmcgraw at vt.edu
Tue Jan 21 11:10:44 PST 2003


At 10:27 AM 1/21/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>from:
>http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=5620
>
>
>-"Americans who care about their country and its
>future should think about the following. This
>anti-American pro-terrorist movement is now larger
>than the anti-Vietnam pro-Communist "peace" movement
>was until the very end of the Sixties. Yet there is no
>draft. Before the draft the anti-Vietnam movement was
>very very small. Its demonstrations were numbered in
>the hundreds of participants, not even the thousands."
>


>From the article:

"America's enemies within turned out in force on Saturday in Washington DC and San Francisco under the auspicies of the Communist Workers World Party operating under its front organization, A.N.S.W.E.R. Once again the demonstrators pretended to be peace activists, who found violence abhorrent and a willing media played along with the charade. Neither the New York Times nor the Los Angeles Times nor any media I saw identified the organizers as Communists who have a long record of support for world terror and its leaders including the Ayatollah Khomeini, Kim Jong Il, Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein."

Not to give too much credit to horowitz, who is merely repeating what leftists already know, but I have been wondering about this myself. If they're as eager to smear the protesters as everyone seems to think, why aren't the networks and major papers making a bigger deal out of the leadership and their creepy politics? Could it be laziness? Bias? Honest stupidity?

--steve

------------------------------------------------------ The best way to support our troops is not to start a war. Duh.

http://www.collegiatetimes.com/index.php?ID=244 ------------------------------------------------------



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list