``...This anti-American pro-terrorist movement is now larger than the anti-Vietnam pro-Communist "peace" movement was until the very end of the Sixties. Yet there is no draft. Before the draft the anti-Vietnam movement was very very small...
...Neither the New York Times nor the Los Angeles Times nor any media I saw identified the organizers as Communists who have a long record of support for world terror and its leaders including the Ayatollah Khomeini, Kim Jong Il, Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein...''
David Horowitz
---------
Horowitz must be off his medication again or something. There was no `before the draft', since the draft was re-started just prior to the Korean war and was re-newed whenever it came up for vote until after Vietnam. What Horowitz might mean is before the escalation using regular US Army forces instead of Marines and Special Forces.
And it seems almost silly to point out that Khomeini and Hussein are not communists, or that the US protest movements are not anti-American nor are they pro-terrorist---whatever pro-terrorist might mean. The world might be a better place if all that was true, but sad to say it isn't.
I would prescribe a change of medication combined with one of the newer but very costly out-patient programs for ORPFs (old rabid paranoid fucks). Perhaps a few day classes at the new Wall Street Academia of Design, with adjunct professor David Brooks. The fine art of propaganda offers quite a few more colors on its palette these days. That old iron oxide red on black hate-mongering looks so out of it. Why there's the titanium white of omission, the soft smear of an earth toned wash, that lush effusion from Alizarin Crimson painted wet into Zinc white to make even the worst rightwing turd like Bush, flush with a rosy glow.
Acrylic of course. One wouldn't want the poor old dear getting high on the paint fumes.
Chuck Grimes