> Subj:Re: Badly drafted law? Was Re: Raimondo on Ritter
> Date:1/25/2003 10:01:08 AM Pacific Standard Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:dhenwood at panix.com">dhenwood at panix.com</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:lbo-talk at lists.panix.com">lbo-talk at lists.panix.com</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:lbo-talk at lists.panix.com">lbo-talk at lists.panix.com</A>
> Sent from the Internet
>
>
>
> DoreneFC at aol.com wrote:
>
> >(As a side note, I think the weapons inspector who is into SM is just
> >sublime: The whole inspection exercise is a HUGE exercise in dominance and
> >submission if you ask me.)
>
> Nonconsensual, though.
>
> Doug
>
You think? Iraq is still a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty. Whether that is a scene I would want to play in, how free Iraq feels not to play, whether other players are playing safe are different problems, but I am all for trying any metaphor that some way or another suggests ways out of the current mess. Not sure the SM analogy does that, but I am still thinking about that angle.
DoreneC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20030125/e896a55e/attachment.htm>