> On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Michael Perelman wrote:
>
>> Why does the right, which is so good at hate, not hate Perot for
>> Nadering
>> Bush, Sr.?
>> --
>
> Because Perot didn't actually cost Bush the '92 election?
>
while this apppears to be true, they haven't let facts stop them before, have they? i suspect it has more to do with doug's point, namely, that bush pere was never considered a worthy successor to reagan by the right. reagan was an ideologue, bush pere a careerist who couldn't be trusted.
read my lips.
j