On a more political level, you just aren't going to get UFPJ and ANSWER to work together. UFPJ exists because the liberal and progressive anti-war activists want a big organized alternative to the vanguardist ANSWER. There has even been a recent split within UFPJ, by activists who are upset with the lack of internal democracy in UFPJ. Of course, ANSWER and UFPJ may be the most loud-mouthed of the peace groups, but they represent a minority within the greater movements against war (especially local peace and justice groups). I just can't see this effort to "unite" the peace movement (sic) panning out, as it would inflame a struggle for power by the authoritarians running UFPJ and ANSWER.
For multiple movements against war and for peace, not one big one run by self-appointed leaders,
Chuck0 Infoshop.org
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
> Dear Friends:
>
> The statement below was adopted at last night's [July 8] meeting of the
> Northeast Ohio Anti-War Coalition (NOAC). We would greatly appreciate
> any help you can give in disseminating it as widely as possible to
> anti-war groups.
>
> In solidarity,
>
> Jerry Gordon
> Member, NOAC Coordinating Committee
>
> *************************
>
> A Call for Unity of the U.S. Anti-War Movement
>
>
> To: Act Now to Stop War & End Racism (ANSWER)
> United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ)
> United States Labor Against the War (USLAW)
>
> The Northeast Ohio Anti-War Coalition (NOAC) was established in October,
> 2002 to unify antiwar forces in Northeast Ohio in an open, democratic
> coalition with the objective of helping prevent the threatened U.S. war
> against Iraq. In the aftermath of the conventional phase of that war, we
> decided to retain our coalition and to continue building demonstrations
> around such demands as "Bring the Troops Home Now! End the Occupation of
> Iraq!"