--- Yoshie Furuhashi <furuhashi.1 at osu.edu> wrote:
> At Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:47:51 -0700 (PDT), andie
> nachgeborenen wrote:
> >3. AN INTERIM, MORE NEUTRAL ADMINISTRATION MUST BE
> CREATED TO
> >PROVIDE ESSENTIAL POLICE AND SOCIAL SERVICES BEFORE
> WITHDRAWAL IS
> >COMPLETE
>
> Let's avoid the passive voice. Make clear the agent
> who is to create
> the police and social services "before withdrawal is
> complete."
> Don't tell me "the United Nations," which conjures
> up in the mind of
> the reader a soothing image of the General Assembly
> of equal
> sovereign states. Within the existing structure of
> the UN, only the
> UN Security Council -- more specifically, the five
> permanent members
> with veto powers -- can make decisions like this.
> The US can veto
> any proposal that it dislikes in the US SC (and it
> has wielded most
> vetoes since the end of the Cold War).
>
> BTW, the demand #3 above cannot but evoke nightmares
> of "orderly
> withdrawal" and "peace with honor."
>
> At 1:05 PM -0700 7/23/03, andie nachgeborenen wrote:
> >The US not going to withdraw and it is not going to
> allow an honest
> >interim govt to be set up. It is as naiuve to think
> the fortmer as
> >the latter.
>
> Why bother calling for "an interim, more neutral
> administration," if
> you think it naive to imagine it to be possible
> anyways?
>
I think withdrawal is also a naive demand, it's not going to happen. But, as I have repeatedly stated, it serves an educative function here and raises the costs of next venture.
jks
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com