ominous logic (was Re: [lbo-talk] TIMES letter on standdown)

Shane Taylor s-t-t at juno.com
Sat Jul 26 12:13:38 PDT 2003


Shane Mage fwd'd this letter to the Times:


> The Congressional committee does not address the
> slow response time to the attacks as they were
> occurring. Why did the North American Aerospace
> Defense Command's response take so long during
> what should have looked like a hijacking in the
> first two minutes of these well-coordinated attacks?
>
> Federal Aviation Administration regulations state
> that fighters should be scrambled once any aircraft
> deviaters more than 15 degrees off-course or at the
> first failiong of equipment such as transponders...
> more than 3,000 people died because such rules
> were ignored.
>
> The real question to be answered...is not 'Why
> didn't we expect them?' but rather 'Who left the
> door open for them?'

Political commentary for conspiracists is a bit like being on Jeopardy. You're answers must be in the form of a question.

"A phrase (it often happened when he was exhausted) kept cycling round and round, preconsciously, just under the threshold of lip and tongue movement: 'Events seem to be ordered into an ominous logic.' It repeated itself automatically and Stencil improved on it each time, placing emphasis on different words -- 'events _seem_'; 'seem to be _ordered_'; '_ominous_ logic' -- pronouncing them differently, changing the 'tone of voice' from sepulchral to jaunty: round and round and round. Events seem to be ordered into an ominous logic. He found paper and pencil and began to write the sentence in varying hands and type faces."

-- from _V._ by Thomas Pynchon

________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list