> "Grant Lee" <grantlee at iinet.net.au>>...If that is your definition, then the
> introduction of capitalist livestock
> industries, in the last 18th Century, was the most significant genocidal
> act
> of all.
>
>
> Calling Dr. Heidegger! "âAgriculture is now a motorized food-industryâin
> essence, the same as the manufacturing of corpses in the gas chambers and
> the extermination camps, the same as the blockade and starvation of the
> countryside, the same as the production of the hydrogen bombs.â
>
If someone institutes a system of economics the outcome of which is that millions of people die, or that whole cultural groups vanish, what do you call that? Not genocide? So is it a genocide if one reorganises the countryside into unworkable communes, but not if one refuses provide grain to starving Indians so as to disrupt the play of the free market? What difference does it make if you starve for someone else's ideals or are gassed for someone else's ideals?
Btw, I take great offence at being compared to Heidegger in this context. I cannot see what that adds to the debate.
Thiago