>>These single tenants were the ones who held out the longest against
>>it. Maybe they were selfish thoughtless people who took it for
>>granted they were entitled to rattle around in their half-empty
>>houses while other people, all battlers themselves, subsidised them.
>>Its not quite that simple though, it was more a matter of having
>>unrealsitic attitudes and being stubbornly resistant to the idea of
>>actually taking responsibility for management. They had this
>>ridiculous notion that it was someone else's responsibility, not just
>>to pay for it, but more importantly to devise a solution.
>
>
>why, they are evil shirkers living off others!
Yeah, but that's not the problem. The problem is, the federal government is offering and can afford it. Anyone who prefers trying to squeeze blood from a stone is plainly making a bad management decision, I can't hack that.
Bill Bartlett Bracknell Tas