>The second paragraph of the WSJrnl's lead article today:
>
>"In a landmark decision with wide-ranging implications for affirmative
>action across American society, the court ruled that it is legal to give
>some preferential treatment to disadvantaged minorities, calling the
>diversity that they bring to education, business and the military necessary
>to the cultivation of "a set of leaders with legitimacy in the eyes of the
>citizenry."
>
>A new twist to the idea of repressive tolerance from the election thieves.
>Is it implausible to think that O'Connor explicitly sees this ruling as
>counterbalancing some of the damage they did?
Big capital likes affirmative action, and submitted amicus briefs in support of it. As Marx said, the better a ruling class is able to absorb the natural leaders of the dominated class, the more solid & dangerous is its rule.
Doug