<http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/26/scotus.sodomy/index.html>
Can't see why Clarence dissented -- the dude loves porn, so you'd think this would be a no-brainer, as most of his decisions are . . .
DP -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20030626/6f0bb041/attachment.htm>