No, I agree on that. I'm a little more interested in the terms of the debate. Despite all that is said about the imperfections of perfect competition, the whole argument about prevailing prices, derived from Marx through Ricardo, seems to me to imitate the neoclassical argument about equilibrium prices, as, in its own way, does the argument about competition. I like the way Bina addresses in principle, but I'd like something a little more than deductions from theory.
Christian