which is worse

joanna bujes joanna.bujes at sun.com
Tue Mar 25 10:06:33 PST 2003


At 07:54 PM 03/24/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>I wasn't aware that the Oscars were supposed to represent a moral judgment
>on people's lives. I though they were supposed to reflect Hollywood's
>perception of artistic attainment. I thought The Pianist was great, btw;
>I've generally liked Polanski's work. As far as ethics goes, I like some
>of Charleton Heston's (Touch of Evil) and John Wayne's (The Searchers)
>work too. jks
> Dennis Perrin <dperrin at comcast.net> wrote:Michael Moore getting booed by
> "liberal" Hollywood for openly opposing Bush's war? Or "liberal"
> Hollywood giving pedophile Roman Polanski a Standing O for winning Best
> Director? DP

The Oscars are a three hour advertisement for Hollywood and the American way (and a fashion show) disguised as an awards ceremony. I have watched it off and on over the years. I don't know that I have ever seen a more self-satisfied bunch of people all together in one place in my whole life.

Joanna



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list