Explananda Re: Psycho-sexual explanation

Carrol Cox cbcox at ilstu.edu
Sun Mar 30 06:22:09 PST 2003


As I suggested (predicted) in my opening post in this thread, those who claim the usefulness of psycho-sexual explanations (=psychoanalysis?) have devoted their posts to claiming that such explanations _could be_ useful. No one that I know of has _ever_ actually defended a political proposition with psychological evidence -- I exclude those cases where the proposition can be defended _without_ appeal to such evidence.

If our interest is understanding social phenomena, we will find that psychological theories are _either_ tautological _or_ fail to tell us anything that we do not already know.

That is a generalization based on my own remembered experience of reading such attempts at analysis. The refutation of it can't consist of claims that this or that psychological theory _could_ explain this or that. Rather it must consist of defending an actual political proposition with such evidence PLUS a demonstration that that proposition cannot be arrived at by other routes.

I don't think any such non-trivial proposition exists.

Carrol



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list