[lbo-talk] Straussian moralist as high rolling gamber

Jim Farmelant farmelantj at juno.com
Sat May 3 17:10:19 PDT 2003


On Sat, 3 May 2003 19:35:34 -0400 "Luke Weiger" <lweiger at umich.edu> writes:
> > Bennett says that he sees no moral issues with his gambling.
> > Was he speaking exoterically or esoterically?
> >
> > Jim F.
>
> Bennett's not a neocon, and not all neocons (a label which really
> just means
> conservatives who happen to be Jewish) are Straussians.

Whose calling Bennett a neocon? And who BTW is asserting that neocons are just conservatives who happen to be Jewish? I would consider people like Jean Kirkpatrick or the late Pat Moynihan to be neocons, although they were not Jewish. Milton Friedman is Jewish but I would label him a libertarian conservative rather than a neocon. And some of the earliest of the necons like James Burnham were certainly not Jews, Burnham having been a rather uppercrust WASP.

And anyway Robert Locke does classify Bennett as being of the Straussian camp. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=1233

Jim F.


>
> -- Luke
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list