> Elmer Gantry, recall, like to drink and screw, two perfectly delightful
> activities, especially the latter -- it wasn't his doing them but his
> denouncing them as immoral while doing them that made him a hypocrite.
Yes, but that's just the point: Bennett has never denounced this. And he said publicly a decade ago that he never would.
> No, the point is not that what he does is immoral, In facr, he's
> probably got an illness, comulsive gambling.
What makes you think it's compulsive? Is doing something a lot when you enjoy it and can afford it compulsive? When it has no bad side effects for you or anyone else? If so I'm a compulsive book buyer.
If Bennett is lying then by definition his excuses are no good. But if he's not, they seem like perfectly good explanations in themselves. And if they're true, they're not excuses because there's nothing to excuse.
Maybe I'm just missing something, but I don't see the difference between this and a guy who likes to put lots of money in the futures markets. Poker isn't like roulette. It isn't guaranteed that you lose and the house wins.
Other men waste scads of money and risk their lives sailing boats or flying airplanes. Is this different? Aren't they all equally just forms of high-priced adrenaline-charged fun if they can afford it?
Michael