.From The Claremont Institute Website (4/11/03) Bennett, after disclaiming that he was a Straussian of any stripe, offered a lucid mini-tutorial on justice in Plato's Republic, and gently (perhaps too gently) advised his interlocutors that they were not in full command of their faculties, (But if he were a Straussian he might lie about it! ;>) Shadia Drury does not call a Bennett a Straussian but only a neoconservative influenced by Strauss. Back in the late 1980s his name was mentioned along with real Straussians like Bloom and Bellow for his defense of "the canon" as an embodiment of civilization against "cultural relativism." That may account for the impression thaty he's one.. He's creepazoid anyway. jks
andie nachgeborenen <andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com> wrote:A student of Strauss, if memory is correct. jks
Luke Weiger <lweiger at umich.edu> wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: andie nachgeborenen To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2003 11:33 PMSubject: Re: [lbo-talk] Straussian moralist as high rolling gamber > So _of course_ Bennett doeswn't think gambling (or, for that matter, parricide and incest) is > wrong. Nothing is wrong! (For him.) He cannot, however, consistent with Strauss, say, Well > _I'm_ special and you're not. So he flounders and flops like a fish on the hook. It is delightful > to see. jks You think Bennett is a Straussian? -- Luke
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20030505/8ed7c794/attachment.htm>