[lbo-talk] Michael Moore's site hacked - Replaced with links to debunking articles!

[Guilherme]

> Yep, most efforts at 'debunking' I've seen complain more about how
> shots were sequenced; the way the film is edited, they say, "gives the
> impression" that such and such is a moron, or callous, etc. They can't peg
> it on much, factually, though. They don't like the "impressions" it gives
> about those who believe in political views

	i've found similar in critiques of chomsky.  he 'makes people
think that' etc..

-gr