[lbo-talk] Josh Marshall: Hitchens=Orwell

Brad DeLong delong at econ.Berkeley.EDU
Thu May 29 10:11:30 PDT 2003



>http://talkingpointsmemo.com/....(May 29th, 2003 --
>3:02 AM EDT //.............
>
>
>"Sorta, kinda, not-really money quote from Chris
>Hitchens' review of Blumenthal's The Clinton Wars ...
>
>'I think it is only for strict party reasons that
>[Blumenthal] fails to mention Roger Tamraz and James
>Riady and all Clinton's other thick-envelope direct
>donors, and concentrates instead on saying (at
>excruciating length) that Whitewater produced no
>smoking gun. This may be true, though it is not true
>that the Clintons ever acted as if they had nothing to
>hide or nothing to fear.'
>
>People's evidence #492 that Orwell really does matter.
>And why it would have been nice to have him around in
>the late 90s, or maybe even in editing this review.

You've misread Marshall. Marshall's point is that Orwell would have torn Hitchens into shreds and gobbets...



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list