>They're not "pretty good numbers". They're just not putrid numbers.
>You've gotten yourself anchored to the wrong set of benchmarks...
Brad, you wrote on your blog that the popular 400,000 benchmark of first-time fillings for unemployment was too high, and would be better set at 360,000. Why is that?
-- Shane
________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!