[lbo-talk] Re: Anybody But Bush for Empire

Yoshie Furuhashi furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
Fri Nov 14 13:06:05 PST 2003



> Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>
> >The question I'd like to ask Doug is how he squares the fearless call to
> >action expressed in Patti Smith's line, "We created it. Let's take it
> >over," with the slogan motivated by nothing but fear: Anybody But Bush.
>
> Like I've said a hundred times now, the political and discursive
> atmosphere created by W is fearful and repressive. If he were
> replaced, the atmosphere would improve. And it'd be somewhat easier
> to organize unions.
>
> Doug
>

I think that it was once (say, in the life and times of FDR) possible to say that the Democratic Party was better for unions and social movements in the USA than the Republican Party within the parameters of capitalism. I don't think it is true any longer. It took a Democratic president, rather than a Republican one, to eliminate AFDC, to take just one example.

Besides, as Ted argues, both arguments can't be true at the same time: the multitude are ready to "take it over" and the multitude must vote for Anybody But Bush ("or else"). If the multitude were ready to "take it over," why bother electing a Democrat?

Yoshie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list