<snipped for brevity but, still, too fuuny joanna>
>Kelly wrote:
>(who still wants to have an LOB party so all the LOB chixors can do
>>the dick swing with big inflatable plastics dicks. Yeah, we'll to it to
>>the Tootsieroll! Joanna, you can choreograph!)
>
>
>Ted wrote:
>"Couldn't it be done just as well by a Turing machine?"
oh... yeah... far better. I'd plan on being delightfully tanked while I'm dancing on bar tables with my sistahs! Can you get a Turing machine to act like a drunken fool tripping all over her dick!?
Also, can they get a Turning machine's silicone to look natural these days?
To Curtiss, who wrote: And what if she turned you around, opened
> > *your* panel and said, "De te fabula narratur?"
> >
> > --
> > Curtiss
Oh curtiss, I had to agree with michael. I'd dump her, not b/c she was "not human" but because she lied about it. Which is what he said: he'd dump her for lying _and_ support her political rights. (Now, perhaps if he realized that he truly loved her and her excuse was that she'd been worried about human prejudice, he might soften up and forgive the lying. And support her political rights, too)
as for this whine about, apparently, what is and what isn't appropriate fodder for conversation: sosdd, curtiss and alan. Initially, most people do this. They often complain about "us" as if they're not part of "us" because they don't actually feel part of lame brained onanists just yet. Lobbers are lacking, lobbers ought to be like this, or that, they ought to espouse this view or that or at least views within a tidy, specified range of acceptable views, damn it.
After a flame fest or three or some other similar degradation ritual, they get over it. We all did, eh?
BTW, 2a = Support your right to bare arms: wear short sleeves!
Kelley
(and here I thought I'd get questions about haysooz freak! :)))