[lbo-talk] re conspiramongering

Stephen Philion philion at hawaii.edu
Fri Nov 21 19:56:30 PST 2003


wrong, it is 'conpiracizing' to question the governments obviously phony version of events of what happened

--interesting, so there's no room in your 'analysis' for ideology? it's just all bad guys doing bad things on purpose. remarkable, as black and white as it gets. -=---------------------------------------- obedient progressives do not ask any questions lest they are branded with the dreaded 'conspiracist' tag.

--ah yes, can you imagine wanting to question people with such fine progressive credentials as Thomas Moorer, John SInglaub, monika jensen stevensen, lyndon larouche,....or those on the left who give credence to such types... ------------------------------------------------------------ I don't get what you mean about unions and all (I happen to have worked for the late Victor Van Bourg, the firebrand union lawyer, who was something of a conspiracist himself)

---i wonder what thomas moorer, lyndon larouche, fletcher prouty, monika jensen-stevenson,... the liberty lobbyists... or their ilk think of unions...

Chip about got it all down in his CJR article on conspiracy theorists... http://archives.cjr.org/year/93/3/spooky.asp



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list