California voters are much more conservative than is acknowledged, amny Democrats are 'Reaga-Democrats' and many of the young first-time-voters who voted for Arnold were the direct or indirect progency of this Reagan-Democrat tendency.
I think the best thing for progressives and liberals could have done would have been to convince Clint Eastwood or Warren Beatty to run (I''m only half-kidding ;-) What I do mean is for the Democrats to have run a popular Democrat like Leon Pannetta, John Vasconcelos, or even John Burton himself, but I think even that strategy may not have worked - but I'm sure it would have made a better showing than that of Cruz Bustamante a career Democratic party hack who could not even mobilize the Latino vote (who voted for Arnold at a rate of 3 ot of 5).
The fix was in, I think the reason why prominent Democrats like Feinstein, or the aforementioned did not jump in was that they realized they could not beat Arnold. The only hope was to try to stave-off the recall itself. But, alas, twas too late,
Joe W.
>From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: RE: [lbo-talk] Myth Making on Schwarzenegger's victory
>Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:05:44 -0400
>
>Joseph Wanzala wrote:
>
>>If the recall has told us anything, it is that it is time for the
>>Democrats to jettison the DLC/Clintonista miliue.
>
>If so, why did Camejo and Huffington fall so flat?
>
>Doug
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
_________________________________________________________________ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com