A theme of the US Leftwing group Solidarity is that they want to pronounce on correct policy somewhere else in the world outside of the USA, instead of concentrating on tackling the question of how their own government actually pursues its foreign policy, and how that could be changed in a progressive sense, and then relating to other countries on that basis. And I have a different style, and do not want to be associated with that sort of thinking, because otherwise I am getting into another quagmire where personal opinions substitute for the political line of a bona fide political organisation, and I am dealing with stuff that I cannot affect anyhow.
I am a financial and not very active ordinary member of the Dutch Socialist Party, and we have a different style of work from Solidarity, and more members. There is a very clear distinction in the Dutch SP between party policy expressed by people mandated to do it, and individual opinions, and we don't like to mix that up, and therefore I always distinguish clearly between my own opinions and the opinions of the SP, also when I post info, naming the source of translation. In the SP, there are in principle no restrictions on individual opinions, except where people are willfully misrepresenting party policy, or expressing views incompatible with party membership.
J.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Pugliese" <debsian at pacbell.net> To: "lbo-talk" <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:43 AM Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] in defence of the book
> Cuba: The Opposition and the Repression Haroldo Alfonso Dilla
> Against The Current, current issue. By a Cuban marxist, expelled from
the
> Party in '99.
> http://solidarity.igc.org/indexATC.html
>
> --
> Michael Pugliese
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>