[lbo-talk] 'Democrazy'

[Joseph Wanzala]

To present a critique of democracy is not necessarily to be proposing 
fascism, indeed part of his critique of Democracy is that it can result in 
the election of a 'Fuhrerprinzip' like Jurg Haider. Obviously Treanor is 
interested in the development of more effective systems of governance of the 
kinds I assume we would all support in a general sense. Chomsky and others 
also critique Democracy - does that make them implicitly supportive of 
fascism? Is there anything in Treanor's writing or background that you base 
you query on?

Joe W.


>From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] 'Democrazy'
>Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:11:39 -0400
>
>What's the antonym of democracy that Treanor implicitly seems to prefer? 
>The Fuhrerprinzip? Dictatorship of the proletariat? Each against all?
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

_________________________________________________________________
Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in 
enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today!   
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es