[lbo-talk] Re: the neo-neocons

Eubulides paraconsistent at comcast.net
Tue Oct 21 16:30:14 PDT 2003


----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Grimes" <cgrimes at rawbw.com>


>
> I am afraid I have almost the same aversion as you. Remember too, I've
> only started reading Bloom and Strauss. There is a whole system of
> ideas and people in a spectrum that I don't really understand.
>
> For example, Michael Pollak just wrote: ``Today's neocons (unlike
> their forebears) don't seem to care about domestic policy at all. And
> to the extent they do, they don't seem to have any distinctive ideas
> about it....''
>

=================

What about James Q. Wilson? Wouldn't he qualify as a neocon in love with new methods/justifications of discipline/punish of contemporary domestic labor-leisure dynamics?

Ian



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list