>
> I am afraid I have almost the same aversion as you. Remember too, I've
> only started reading Bloom and Strauss. There is a whole system of
> ideas and people in a spectrum that I don't really understand.
>
> For example, Michael Pollak just wrote: ``Today's neocons (unlike
> their forebears) don't seem to care about domestic policy at all. And
> to the extent they do, they don't seem to have any distinctive ideas
> about it....''
>
=================
What about James Q. Wilson? Wouldn't he qualify as a neocon in love with new methods/justifications of discipline/punish of contemporary domestic labor-leisure dynamics?
Ian