>From: Ted Winslow <egwinslow at rogers.com>
>Chris Doss wrote:
>
>>Kant is at the other extreme from solipsism; the noumenonal world is very
>>real. Just ineffable.
>
>What grounds can he provide for the claim that "the noumenonal world is
>very real", i.e. why isn't the claim self-contradictory in the way I
>suggested?
>
>Ted
It means that there is a ground for my experience beyond myself. Otherwise,
I would be putting myself in the place of a deity (as does Fichte).
Berkeley also was not really a solipsist, since he did belief in an
objective ground for experience: God.
>
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
_________________________________________________________________ Help protect your PC: Get a free online virus scan at McAfee.com. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963