[lbo-talk] * Materialism and Empirio-Criticism*

[andie nachgeborenen]

I am not going to get involved in this one, but I am
reminded of a joke of Russell's. Faced by an
aristocratic Lady's demand that he refute solipsism
for her, he said, Certainly, my Lady, but to whom
should I address my response? jks

--- Ted Winslow <egwinslow at rogers.com> wrote:
> 
> Chris Doss wrote:
> 
> > Just as an aside, there _is_ no effective argument
> against assertions 
> > of solipsism.
> 
> Shouldn't this be: no effective argument that
> doesn't involve amendment 
> of the premises about reality and experience that
> logically imply the 
> solipsism?
> 
> Don't Marx and Husserl, for instance, avoid
> solipsism by amending, on 
> phenomenological grounds, the premises that imply
> it?
> 
> Ted
> 
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com