[lbo-talk] Re: Hitchens

Eubulides paraconsistent at comcast.net
Thu Sep 4 11:54:56 PDT 2003


----- Original Message ----- From: "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:23 AM Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Re: Hitchens


> I think Hitchens' position on the Bush wars is contemptible, but he was
> right about the impeachment. Clinton was guilty as charged and should
> have been removed. In retrospect, it's hard to see how that would have
> been worse than what actually happened: Gore would have become
president,
> run as an incumbent, and won by "maximizing the incumbency." Then at
> least we would have had *Democratic* neocon wars. --CGE
>

====================

If the erotophobic Right hadn't been supreme scum and politicized a blow job Clinton would never have felt compelled to lie or dispute the polysemy of 'is.' That they cared more about his sex life than his approach to foreign policy shows they're not fit to hold a single office in the land. Non-linear politics, courtesy of the Baptist church.

Ian



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list