> Moore argues that the effect on social wealth would be
> drastic enough that society would not be able to be
> productive enough to maintain socialism. That would be
> a problem with Chuck's idea -- a primitive society
> based on isolated communities at a low level of
> technical development would probably have private
> property, though not capiatlist markets -- a
> subsistance society of petty producers.
Sorry, but I'm not advocating a subsistence society. Even after a dramatic social change, we would still have a huge amout of current technology around.
On the other hand, the efforts to associate me with wanting a return to a primitive society evidence plenty of Western bias against subsistence societies as being bad.
Chuck0