Yes indeedy: Stiglitz's globalization book needed an editor. He needed to decide whether its criticism of the IMF was:
--that the IMF, horribly, infringes on national sovereignty by only lending after putting constraints on what a national leader (like Suharto) can do with its money, and should lend freely to governments without conditions in the interest of respecting developing-country sovereignty.
--that the IMF, horribly, props up kleptocrats (like Suharto) by lending their governments any money at all.
--that the IMF, horribly, did not recognize that a kleptocrat (like Suharto) is better than near-anarchy, and did not do enough to keep Suharto in power.
--that the IMF, horribly, encouraged private investment in Indonesia, even though private investment under a kleptocrat (like Suharto) is likely to reduce the welfare of the recipient country.
I think there's a rule that you are allowed to make only two of these points in the same book.
Brad DeLong