What you said was that members of this list, because they announced an ANSWER rally, were, therefore, pro-Ba'athist. Now, I don't have any evidence that ANSWER is pro--Ba'athist, for one. You can put forward an argument, but you have to convince me. And I'm no fan of ANSWER. Then, you turned around, and tried to claim that b/c Yoshie encouraged attendance at teh rally, the she's pro-Ba'athist.
Horse Hockey. She's no more pro-Ba'athist than you were pro-Bush for endorsing the beliefs you endorsed post-9/11. You had an argument and deserved to have your argument taken seriously, not painted as a Bush defender. Ditto Yoshie. You didn't argue with her, you attacked ANSWER and then claimed that she was like ANSWER b/c she dares associate with them by supporting attendance at their rallies.
The other logical fallacy was to insist that people who hated the Iraq occupation but defended China/Tibet were hypocrits. Calling someone a hypocrite is ad hominem tu quoque. Logical fallacy. Bad juju. elides substance. you have more to offer than this cheap crap.
Kelley