James Devine wrote:
> (The fact that Oslo wasn't going to work is suggested by the fact that
Sharon was able destroy it with a > single act, indeed with a non-violent
act. Oslo was like a pyramid sitting on its apex, in econ-talk an
> unstable equilibrium.)
So the 2000 peace talks were bound to fail? Arafat *had* to walk away from Camp David without even making so much as a counter offer? (And let me preempt any smears by saying I don't think peace talks should be required to end the occupation: Israel should just get the fuck out. But that doesn't absolve the Palestinian leadership from any and all responsibility for the current state of affairs.)
-- Luke