[lbo-talk] Intelligence: An evolutionary dead end?

Michael Pollak mpollak at panix.com
Fri Sep 26 13:38:27 PDT 2003


[Hilarious. It seems it makes you get side tracked -- even when

you're a fruit fly]

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994200

Cleverness may carry survival costs

13:50 24 September 03

NewScientist.com news service

Being smart is not always a good thing in the evolutionary race,

suggests a new study by Swiss researchers

If intelligence were always a positive attribute, it would always be

selected for by natural selection. But it is not - people and animals

have their dolts as well as their Einsteins.

To evolutionary biologists, that diversity means that theoretically,

there must be some cost to being smart. Now for the first time,

researchers have shown that in fruit flies at least, it doesn't always

pay to be clever.

When Frederic Mery and colleagues at the University of Fribourg,

pitted fast-learning fruit fly larvae against their more dimwitted

cousins in scarce food conditions - the slower fruit flies came out on

top.

"This shows that just having a better ability to learn involves a

cost, even when you aren't using it," Mery told New Scientist.

Sabotaged flavour

The team first bred a group of fast-learning flies. They allowed fruit

flies to lay eggs on gels flavoured with either orange or pineapple

juice. But one or the other was also spiked with bitter quinine. The

next time round the flies were given the juice only - but some

remembered which had previously been laced with quinine and laid their

eggs on the other flavour.

The scientists collected those eggs to breed the next generation of

flies, gave those flies the same opportunity to learn, and bred the

next generation from those that made the "right" choice.

After 20 generations, most flies from the selected line could learn

the task in one go. They were not just better at tasting different

juices or more averse to quinine, as ordinary flies could eventually

learn to avoid the sabotaged flavour too, but it took them three to

five sessions.

When the ordinary flies did learn, they also forgot faster than the

selected flies. "That shows we selected a gene that improves both

memory and the speed of learning, or two genes that are tightly

linked," says Mery.

Neuronal connections

However, when the larvae of the more astute flies were made to compete

with ordinary larvae for scarce food, fewer of them survived.

"They are slower at feeding," says Mery. He speculates that the flies

may have to invest more energy in making or re-arranging connections

between neurons in their brains, leaving them with less energy to

forage when calories are limited.

He cautions that the work measures the ability of fruit flies to learn

only a particular task, though the group is testing whether their

smart flies are also better at learning other things. "But this should

open up the evolutionary question," he says. In principle, it should

be possible to look for the costs of intelligence even in primates.

The group is now collaborating with molecular geneticists to try and

tease out which genetic changes have made their fruitflies so smart.

Journal reference: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (DOI

10.1098/rspb.2003.2548)

Debora MacKenzie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list