> That sounds right to me. I'm curious where'd you'd classify the late
> 90s - I think (though Chuck0 hates me for it) that low unemployment
> contributed to "Seattle."
>
> Doug
====================
The summer day in '99 you posted Kalecki's piece on full employment on this list I, uh, appropriated it and sent it to a slew of lists 'in' Seattle where folks were discussing strategy and engaging in mutual education. At one of the next meetings we held, people I'd never met before started asking questions about him, the bubble, the larger, potentially ugly choices workers and States would face given what he wrote and how soon after the meetings the economy would tank.........
Ian