<html>
<blockquote type=cite cite>Tuesday, February 18, 2003 <br>
<br>
A Weekend Full of Shame<br>
By Boris Kagarlitsky <br>
<br>
The global crisis that came to a head over the weekend has resulted
in defeat and unprecedented humiliation<br>
for the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush. Washington
had been sure that France would not<br>
veto its proposed UN resolution on launching military action
against Iraq. But last Friday it became clear that<br>
the U.S. proposal was dead in the water even without a French veto.
The weapons inspectors did not follow the<br>
script that Washington had expected, and Security Council members
took the floor one after the next to state<br>
their opposition to war. <br>
<br>
An even bigger humiliation for Bush followed in the form of huge
anti-war marches around the world, including<br>
the United States. The few West European governments that still
support Washington came in for massive<br>
street pressure. A consensus is building around the world that Bush
is a dangerous man. The leadership in<br>
Washington kept stubbornly repeating that Saddam Hussein poses a
threat to humanity, but their exhortations<br>
had the opposite effect. Hussein clearly poses a threat to his own
people, but millions of people around the<br>
world have reached the conclusion that Bush, not Hussein, poses a
threat to the planet.<br>
<br>
While the U.S. leadership came under attack, Russia once more<br>
demonstrated its impotence and insignificance. Over the past
decade<br>
Russia has been politically dependent on the United States,
and<br>
economically on Germany. The United States dictated Russia's
political<br>
agenda, while Germany gradually became its most important
business<br>
partner and source of foreign investment. This system worked quite
well<br>
so long as Germany kept a low profile in international affairs and
at least<br>
made a show of solidarity with the United States. When
disagreements<br>
between the United States and Germany came to the surface,
however,<br>
the Russian leadership was at a loss. <br>
<br>
Moscow behaved like one of Ivan Pavlov's dogs. So long as the
signals<br>
come one at a time, the dog's conditioned reflexes respond properly
-- it<br>
salivates at the sound of the bell. Then the scientist gives it
two<br>
contradictory signals. The poor beast goes into a panic, spinning
around<br>
in its cage. Something similar has happened with the Russian
leadership<br>
this winter. Only when it became clear that France and Germany
would<br>
secure a majority in the Security Council, and that no veto would
be<br>
required, did President Vladimir Putin demonstratively side with
the<br>
victors. <br>
<br>
For 10 years Kremlin ideologues have led the public to believe that
Russia must support the United States or<br>
risk condemnation from the "entire civilized world." The
events of last Friday revealed, however, that<br>
Washington is now isolated. Russian policymakers drew the right
conclusion in the end. As was immediately<br>
obvious, however, their actions were driven not by firm principles
or concern for the national interest, but sheer<br>
opportunism. The sight of Russian leaders mouthing words dictated
in Berlin while never taking their eyes off<br>
of Washington was nothing short of embarrassing.<br>
<br>
Russian society, unfortunately, seized the opportunity to sink to
the level of its leaders. On Saturday, when<br>
hundreds of thousands of protesters took to the streets of Western
Europe, the United States and even<br>
Australia, Russians preferred to stay at home. This would have made
sense if Russians supported Bush or<br>
approved of the war, but polls show that opposition to war in Iraq
is no less widespread here than in most<br>
European countries. Even the Chechen campaign no longer enjoys
broad support. Anti-war sentiment may be<br>
quite high, but the public has no plans to tell anyone about
it.<br>
<br>
Local leaders in some provincial towns organized anti-war marches,
rounding up participants using the good<br>
old Soviet tactic of "compulsory voluntarism." In Moscow,
where the old tactics no longer work, two<br>
demonstrations were held. Leftist and pacifist organizations
rallied about 200 young people on Tverskoi Bulvar<br>
under the slogan: "No War in Iraq and Chechnya!" The
Communists and their nationalist allies barely managed<br>
to turn out twice that number. For the Communists, with their
enormous resources, this turnout was humiliating.<br>
But the left can hardly be proud of its efforts, either.<br>
<br>
The politicians may well be pleased with how Russia extricated
itself from this crisis. Things could have been<br>
worse, of course. But to be honest, the weekend's events left me
feeling deeply ashamed for Russian society.<br>
<br>
<i> Boris Kagarlitsky is director of the Institute of Globalization
Studies.</i> </blockquote></html>