<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>Speaking for myself--and I can't believe I'm saying this, Shrub has set such a low mark that yes I think Bush Sr was a better president. Sadly that is not saying much!<BR>
<BR>
DoreneC<BR>
<BR>
In a message dated 3/7/2003 2:34:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, lweiger@umich.edu writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Subj:<B>Re: W's transcript </B><BR>
Date:3/7/2003 2:34:27 PM Pacific Standard Time<BR>
From:<A HREF="mailto:lweiger@umich.edu">lweiger@umich.edu</A><BR>
Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:lbo-talk@lists.panix.com">lbo-talk@lists.panix.com</A><BR>
To:<A HREF="mailto:lbo-talk@lists.panix.com">lbo-talk@lists.panix.com</A><BR>
<I>Sent from the Internet </I><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Jim wrote:<BR>
> Well, Bush the Elder did get good grades at Yale, and was<BR>
> I believe, even a Phi Beta Kappa. Did that make him a superior<BR>
> president to his son?<BR>
><BR>
> Jim F.<BR>
<BR>
Reread my message. I explictly said that a smarter W might well not be a<BR>
better president.<BR>
<BR>
-- Luke<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>