<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV>But why does he think that the only option is to cave?  This reminds me of Trotsky's comment regarding terrorists having no faith in the masses, it appears that apologizers haven't any as well.  Doesn't he feel that he can assert the importance of trying to "think clearly, and not blame always blame those who disagree with us," and how his opponents are "taking the value of loyalty and turning into a blank check on America's future," blah blah blah??   Or is it that potentially critical Dems feel so outgunned in the media that they don't think they can get their point across, they'll just get O'Reillyed?   My first reaction is to rail at their gutlessness, but is it based on a thoroughly pessimistic analysis of who controls political dialogue/symbolization processes?  </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Randy</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">  </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #008000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> I'm not sure what you expect- Daschle is from one of the more conservative states and still denounced Bush's failures and has only apologized for the timing of his remarks. Daschle hasn't even been a particularly strong antiwar person-- he voted for the resolution last fall-- so what's the point? We do this game all the time-- ignore the two-thirds of House Dems who voted against authorization for war, ignore Gore's denunciation of the war leadup, downplay critical remarks on the war even from Dems who voted for the fall resolution-- then claim, see there is no difference. -- Nathan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Henwood" <<A href="mailto:dhenwood@panix.com">dhenwood@panix.com</A>> [So Nathan, can you tell us how this is anything but revolting?] Daschle Says His Iraq Criticism of Bush Ill-Timed Fri Mar 28, 6:52 PM ET WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle labels as ill-timed his charge that President Bush (news - web sites) "failed so miserably at diplomacy that we're now forced to war." Daschle said in Washington on March 17: "I'm saddened, saddened that this president failed so miserably at diplomacy that we're now forced to war." He voiced his criticism just hours before the president gave Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) an ultimatum to leave Iraq (news - web sites) in 48 hours or face a U.S.-led invasion. "I don't think the timing of those comments were necessarily the best," Daschle was quoted as telling reporters from his home state of South Dakota on Thursday. "I had no idea when I said them what the timing of the military operation would be." A Daschle aide on Friday confirmed the senator's remarks. In response to a wave of Republican criticism, Daschle said the next day he stood by his remarks. A Daschle aide said on Friday the senator still stands by them. In speaking with South Dakota reporters on Thursday, Daschle saluted Bush's execution of the war as well as the U.S. troops fighting it. </BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>