<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Largely because I disagree with your assessment of
Daschle. He's a piss-poor public speaker but for two years,
he's kept the Dems pretty solid in blocking a range of Bush legislation and
judges. With a not terrific hand, he's actually blocked quite a bit of the
damage Bush has tried to do, from Sutton and Estrada to ANWR to the December
Bush tax cut to the bankruptcy bill.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I think that's all pretty praisworthy in my
book</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As for the column, check out the Progressive
Populist-- it runs twice a month at <A
href="http://www.populist.com">www.populist.com</A> :)</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=rhisiart@earthlink.net href="mailto:rhisiart@earthlink.net">R</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=lbo-talk@lists.panix.com
href="mailto:lbo-talk@lists.panix.com">lbo-talk@lists.panix.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, March 30, 2003 5:57
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Daschle eats his words, and
then some</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>nathan, it's interesting how you
continually put an intellectual face -- and rationale if one could call it
that -- on incompetence, weakness, corruption, failure and
stupidity. you find "reason" where there is none. strategy
among the hopeless and confused. and sense among the
senseless. you should be writing columns for a newspaper
somewhere; an embedded journalist for the fools paradise set.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>R</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #008000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=nathanne@nathannewman.org
href="mailto:nathanne@nathannewman.org">Nathan Newman</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=lbo-talk@lists.panix.com
href="mailto:lbo-talk@lists.panix.com">lbo-talk@lists.panix.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, March 30, 2003 11:23
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Daschle eats his words,
and then some</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "RE" <<A
href="mailto:earnest@tallynet.com">earnest@tallynet.com</A>><BR><BR><BR>>But
Daschle does seem to think that unless he apologizes he will be
in<BR>>trouble, so he believes someone is paying
attention. It's just not<BR>clear<BR>>to me if he
is being overwhelmed by public opinion's vagaries, or
allowing<BR>>himself to be overwhelmed in a masochistic, stupefying
gesture. In that<BR>>respect I wish he'd just keep his mouth
shut in the first place, rather<BR>than<BR>>say "Look at me, I'm
powerful, and even I have to crumble and apologize."<BR><BR>Actually I think
it was more strategic than that, laying the political<BR>marker that Bush
had screwed up the diplomacy then signing off for the<BR>duration. And
he never apologized for the analysis, only for the timing--<BR>which in many
ways is a great way to appear to apologize while not<BR>withdrawing the
substance of the criticism. When things go bad, despite<BR>official
Dem support for the troops, the GOP won't be able to then say that<BR>it was
really a bipartisan position.<BR><BR>Daschle and the Dems are trying to have
their cake (criticize Bush) and eat<BR>it too (appear supportive of the
troops). There may be better strategic ways<BR>to do it, but I think people
are overemphasizing the apology and not enought<BR>the substance of the
criticism.<BR><BR>-- Nathan<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>