<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@panix.com></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Yup, though this dispute isn't just about intellectual war.<BR>
<BR>
Doug<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Michel Foucault: What is tiresome in ideological arguments is that one is<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">necessarily swept away by the "model of war." <BR>
-clip<BR>
Wouldn't it be much better<BR>
instead to think that those with whom you disagree are perhaps mistaken; or<BR>
perhaps that you haven't understood what they intended to say?<BR>
<BR>
^^^^^^<BR>
<BR>
CB: Well, Michael Kelly was _definitely_ ,not just "perhaps" ,mistaken. And I didn't misunderstand what he intended to say.<BR>
<BR>
And it is ironic, perhaps poetic justice, (but not using a "model of war" or metaphor of war), that he died in a real , criminal and savage war, that he promoted ideologically.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>