<DIV>This is tiresome. If America were a democracy, Bush wouldn't be President. But we are not talking about Platonic ideals. The non-democarcy envisaged by the Soviet-era fans of Pinochet and acolytes of Kirkpatrick was a right wing dictatorship or military rule -- _no_ elections (not just unfair ones), no free speech, no civil liberties, Zyganov would have been in a concentration camp or dead under them, not lerading the opposition. This is too obvious to say. Please note that I also put "democrats" in scare quotes in describing Yeltsin and Putin. jks<BR><BR><B><I>Chris Doss <itschris13@hotmail.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>><BR>>This was the line of Jean Kirkpatrick and her followers among some of the <BR>>pre-post-Soviet "intelligentsia." Turned out to be wrong there. "Democrats" <BR>>like Yeltsin and Putin were perfectly able to marginalize unacceptable <BR>>politics. jks<BR>---<BR>If Russia had been a democracy, Zyuganov would have been president from <BR>1996-2000.<BR><BR>_________________________________________________________________<BR>The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* <BR>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail<BR><BR>___________________________________<BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p><br><hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/search/mailsig/*http://search.yahoo.com">The New Yahoo! Search</a> - Faster. Easier. Bingo.