<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>I'm not really feeling anything
significant at the moment, Doug. i'm concerned, both
intellectually and emotionally, about the fact the "peace" movement is a flash
in the pan. and is ineffective as far as i'm concerned.
no amount of demonstrations and demonstrators can get knot heads like shrub and
his pals to face reality. they live in a different
world. as F Scott Fitzgerald put it, paraphrase, the rich are
different from you and me.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>there is a clear cut agenda on the
part of the power elite to cement their hegemony across the globe. they've
done this with relative success via the "free trade" route, the WTO, FTAA, World
Bank and other commercial front organizations. there's no reason for
them not to use the willing and complacent US military to accomplish the same
goals where ever there's money to be had for the stealing. there's nothing
stopping an arrogant and well fed, bought out US congress utterly
unconcerned and disinterested in the USA and its people. there's no reason
for them not to continue manipulating the world economy, and national
economies, to meet their needs alone.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>the US public has been lethargic
and complacent for at least 25 years. its sudden awakening may be
symptomatic of concerns more immediate and greater than an illegal invasion of
iraq. but there's almost no one mobilizing around these deeper
concerns. and more importantly, no significant numbers willing
to follow or lead in such mobilization.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>the so-called antiwar movement may
be indicative of public concerns regarding our disappearing health care system,
our disappearing public educational system, our disappearing jobs, our
disappearing quality of life, our disappearing environmental quality, and the
disappeared American Dream (and some disappeared people due to
"anti-terrorism"). these are the concerns that matter most to the
greater american public. but who's articulating them?
who's organizing and staging demonstrations about them?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>for example, Rancho Los Amigos
hospital in Los Angeles County is about to be closed. Marta Russell
has spoken eloquently regarding the need and function of this hospital.
it's literally in a class by itself, and has been for years. and
yet, when hundreds of thousands can turn out for anti-war demonstrations,
pitifully few turn out for causes like keeping Rancho alive. this is
indicative of our nation's inside out priorities, when war thousands of miles
away, as horrible as it is, takes precedence over american's daily
needs.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>as i've mentioned, the white middle
class lead antiwar movement isn't going to have any greater success than the
white middle class lead Equal Rights Amendment which
predictably failed. the concerns regarding health care,
education, quality of life, jobs, etc. of the poor, the working class, minority
groups far outweigh these group's concern with war. until their more
immediate concerns are addressed, they will not be involved in supporting any
movement which does not represent them. until broad based support for
social change in the US develops, any movement is a flash in the
pan.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>it's difficult to get emotionally
involved with -- or have any meaningful emotion reaction to -- something so
transparently shallow and ill fated. "peaceniks" will have to wait
in line behind the daily needs of the US public.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>think the Times of London would be
interested in this? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia color=#008000 size=2>R</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #008000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=dhenwood@panix.com href="mailto:dhenwood@panix.com">Doug Henwood</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=lbo-talk@lbo-talk.org
href="mailto:lbo-talk@lbo-talk.org">lbo-talk</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 15, 2003 11:17
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [lbo-talk] how's it feel?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>The Times of London has asked me to do a piece on what it feels
like <BR>to be a peacenik (the editor's word, Carrol) in America today. I more
<BR>or less know how I feel, but I'm wondering how others feel - <BR>isolated?
hopeful? despondent? shocked? confused?
regretful?<BR><BR>Doug<BR>___________________________________<BR><A
href="http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk">http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>