<DIV>No. But do you doubt that holding, uh, "free" elections with US-provided finnancing for the Mas Canosans (yes, I know he;s dead) and opening the airwaves and the mass media to flood of Faux News style Gusano journalism would lead to a Nicaraguan result? So you might tweak his repressive policy some, but it would still be repressive. As long as the US will not leave Cuba alone, there are no good alternatives. jks<BR><BR><B><I>Luke Weiger <lweiger@umich.edu></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV>Justin wrote:</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>> No, no, no. The problem is that we don't see the truth as Leo sees it -- Democrats aside </DIV>
<DIV>> Nathan's a different story. Castro's repression is wrong, and I'll say it now or at any time. I'll </DIV>
<DIV>> also say that I'm not sure what other choice Castro has, </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>You actually think jailing dissidents will help preserve the gains of revolution? I thought you yourself had said that the current jailings were not only a crime, but an ill-conceived crime as well.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>-- Luke</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p><br><hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/search/mailsig/*http://search.yahoo.com">The New Yahoo! Search</a> - Faster. Easier. Bingo.