<DIV>No, that wasn't Hegel's theory. jks<BR><BR><B><I>Kevin Robert Dean <qualiall@union.org.za></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:37:38 -0400<BR>Wojtek Sokolowski <SOKOL@JHU.EDU>wrote:<BR><BR>> <BR>> Voting is this country is a farce and a public relations<BR>> sham. Picking<BR>> up politicians by a popularity contest is as pointlessas<BR>> as voting any<BR>> other pageant, th ebest cad, th ebest dog, Miss<BR>> America.... By sheer<BR>> law of probablility, random selection from a pool of<BR>> qualified<BR>> individuals would produce better leadership than the<BR>> current voting<BR>> system. I do not think I want to be bothered to<BR>> participate in this<BR>> travesty.<BR>> <BR>> Wojtek<BR>><BR><BR>Wasn't that Hegel's theory?<BR>---<BR>Sent from UnionMail Service [http://mail.union.org.za]<BR><BR>___________________________________<BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/search/mailsig/*http://search.yahoo.com">The New Yahoo! Search</a> - Faster. Easier. Bingo.