<DIV>Ian now falls into the Lakoff fallacy: because we talk in metaphors, there is no truth. You know that I know the drill on this interminable debate, and frankly, I got bored with it years ago. Decades ago, actuallly. I don't believe that you are really a pomist or other kind of relativist, and so I don't know why you are trying to provoke me into laying out this tired ground again. I get particulatly wearily of the endless burden shifdting. Look, I wrote a paper on this, The Paradox of Ideology, Canad. J. Phil. 1993. You havea copy. You want to deal with my views, post specific criticsim. Otherwise, take a hike. jks<BR><BR><B><I>Ian Murray <seamus2001@attbi.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "andie nachgeborenen" <ANDIE_NACHGEBORENEN@YAHOO.COM><BR>To: <LBO-TALK@LBO-TALK.ORG><BR>Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 6:42 AM<BR>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Race<BR><BR><BR>> Ian waxes Rortyian. Fortunately, as Rorty admits, the position is<BR>self-undermining, since the claim that scientific and all other claims are<BR>mere rhetoric is itself, on its own terms, mere rhetoric, and can be<BR>reasonably rejected by them of us as distinguish between rationally based<BR>belief and rhetorical appeals. That doesn't bother Rorty; he things we<BR>rationalists will get bored or bore others with our tedoous talk of<BR>nonrhetorical rationality. But I am surprised to see Ian take up the<BR>relativist torch. jks<BR>><BR>====================<BR><BR>Ah, a quick rhetorical rejoinder that clings to rationality without so<BR>much as a definition except for the putting of a *not* operator to prefix<BR>the term's constructed opposite in order to set the former free from the<BR>Heraclitean flux of history.<BR><BR>Still waiting for the rationalist's non-defeasible definition of the<BR>metalinguistic absolute, until then the relativist/absolutist binary just<BR>looks like another recursion produced by syntax-grammar dynamics peculiar<BR>to human beings...........<BR><BR>Undermining is metaphorical,<BR><BR>Ian<BR><BR>___________________________________<BR>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/search/mailsig/*http://search.yahoo.com">The New Yahoo! Search</a> - Faster. Easier. Bingo.