<DIV>No, not good enough Shane. We can fairly presume that the USG is Up To No Good, and that its lying if its lips are moving. But the difference between healthy suspicion and crackpottery is that the former does not entail giving even a little antecedent credibility to unproven specific charges. Without at least probable cause, we don't even say such things if we want to remain sane and moderately credible. It's part of the higher standards imposed on our side by the fact that we lack power. jks Shane Mage <shmage@pipeline.com> wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Max asks: >"not proven untrue" is a pretty low standard, isn't it? Not when the [even implied] accusation is against a gang with the exclusive power to reveal or suppress the proof. cheers, Shane >I read your cite, and could recognize nothing >that has been *proven* to be untrue. If >anything there has been proven untrue, please >enlighten us. > >Shane Mage > >"Thunderbolt steers all >things." > >Herakleitos of Ephesos, fr. 64 > > >___________________________________ >http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk >___________________________________ >http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><hr SIZE=1> Do you Yahoo!? <a href="http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://rd.yahoo.com/evt=1207/*http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/">SBC Yahoo! DSL</a> - Now only $29.95 per month!