<html>
<body>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font size=3>Bullshit or not, I
would take it with a grain of salt. What surprises<br>
me the most in these results is very little differences between
major<br>
socio-demographic groups (e.g. Male - Female, Occupations, or age).
The<br>
same percent of men and women, young and old, wanting an Islamic<br>
republic? Something is fishy here.<br><br>
Another caveat is the methods how the survey was administered. I
find<br>
it hard to believe that the interviewers were freely roaming through
the<br>
streets of Baghdad, asking people questions. A more likely scenario
is<br>
that the interviewers were somehow 'embedded.' Now how likely is
it<br>
that a person in an occupied country asked by an interviewer
accompanied<br>
by the occupying army soldiers would say that he/she does not like
the<br>
occupying army? Or perhaps there was a variation in how the survey
was<br>
administered (i.e. some interviewers were embedded while others
were<br>
not) -which if true may help explaining the remarkably small
differences<br>
between socio-demographic groups - those asked by 'embedded'<br>
interviewers (men and women alike) gave 'safe' responses, while
those<br>
asked by not embedded ones spoke up their minds.<br><br>
In any case, it is hard to tell without knowing the details. I am
thus<br>
not dismissing these results, but I remain skeptical.<br><br>
Wojtek</blockquote><br>
No need to justify skepticism.. when in comes to "surveys" and
other knowledge claims. Skepticism should be the default option,
no? :)</font></body>
</html>