<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
From: mike larkin <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
--- Doug Henwood <dhenwood@panix.com> wrote:<BR>
> Charles Brown wrote:<BR>
> <BR>
> >This seems to support the position of those of us<BR>
> who say it is the<BR>
> >U.S.'s presence , not its absence or departure,<BR>
> that makes "chaos" ( uh oh,<BR>
> >better call James Bond ) in Iraq.<BR>
> <BR>
> The U.S. destroyed a state that permeated every<BR>
> aspect of Iraqi life. <BR>
> It was hard for institutions to exist outside the<BR>
> Ba'athist <BR>
> structure. As Boris Kagarlitsky once said of the<BR>
> USSR, people related <BR>
> politically to the state and not to each other.<BR>
> Having destroyed that <BR>
> - what's left? Christian said that one of the few<BR>
> seriously left <BR>
> secular parties wants the US out, but the UN in. Why<BR>
> isn't that good <BR>
> enough for you? You know better?<BR>
> <BR>
> Doug<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
"U.S. Out, U.N. In." Nice bumper sticker<BR>
<BR>
__________________________________<BR>
<BR>
CB: Hey, good idea. Then the UN could inspect for WMD's , because WMD's could really cause chaos. Why didn't I think of that ? <BR>
<BR>
Somebody call Bush. Oh , you say Bush is in on this chaos creating thing. How about Blair ? Is he in on creating chaos, too ? Call James Bond and license him to kill 35 more/ day. <BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>